Channel: SciShow clear
1 videos · sorted by score DESC
#ChannelTitleViewsLikesCmtsScoreSentimentDurationTranscriptLink
1SciShowThe Rise and Fall of Stem Cell Research240022964140174.4negative7:36You know how great TV shows often take you on a journey with twists and turns leading to an ending you never saw coming? Signs is like that sometimes too. Consider the case of IPSCs, a kind of stem cell researcher that was going to revolutionize cellular therapy. After years of clinical trials, that failed to happen. But as luck would have it, IPSCs ended up advancing completely different fields. Just a little background. Each cell in your body is optimized to perform a highly specialized role. Your neurons have long-thin structures called axons to carry electrical signals. Your red blood cells don't contain a nucleus, so they have more room to carry oxygen. Each cell also began as exactly the same thing. A humble stem cell with a potential to become anything. We used to think that once a stem cell had become specialized, a process called differentiation, that was how it was stuck forever. But a surprising discovery in 2006 by Japanese biologist Dr. Shinya Yamanaka changed that. His team used modified viruses to deliver 24 genes into adult skin cells. When the viruses entered the cells, they hijacked the cellular machinery and inserted their DNA into the host DNA. When these cells were left to grow, they became something else entirely. They now looked and behaved just like the stem cells found in embryos. The team tested combinations of the 24 genes until they were left with just four that were necessary for the reversal of an adult cell back to a stem cell. Those four genes created a type of protein that controlled if and how much of other genes were expressed. They changed the genes expressed in an adult skin cell into something very similar to an embryonic stem cell. The researchers called these incredible new cells, induced pleuropotin stem cells. Or IPSC. Sleropotin C means the ability to turn into almost any other type of cell. IPSC's were immediately seen as a major breakthrough in stem cell biology. And researchers believed they had incredible medical potential. Just imagine an unlimited supply of specific cell types to repair an organ or tissue that wouldn't be rejected by the patient's immune system because they came from the patient. And to top it all off, IPSC's could be made without the tricky ethical issues that come with using stem cells from embryos, which had been the basis for much stem cell research up to that point. The first clinical trial kicked off in 2013 with researchers making IPSC's from the skin cells of patients with macular degeneration. A condition where damage to the retina leads to loss of vision. The IPSC's were differentiated into retinal cells and transplanted into the eye of the first patient, whose vision improved. But the excitement that had been building over these cells was short-lived. The IPSC's generated from the second patient showed unexpected mutations. Due to safety concerns, the trial was immediately halted. Now, that initial failure wasn't all that surprising. Knowing that it can take decades before a scientific breakthrough results in something that people can actually use. But in the 16 years since IPSC's were discovered, there has been little progress on that front. Changing enough adult cells into IPSC's for cellular therapy turned out to be difficult. And genetic mutations have been a problem in subsequent trials. As of 2021, only 19 clinical trials have taken place that transplanted IPSC's into patients for therapeutic reasons. Of those, only one has advanced to the final phase of testing. But that's not the end of our story. Although research into the use of IPSC's for cell therapy stalled, they would soon lead to incredible advances in other areas. In those applications, the potential for genetic mutations or the technical difficulties of producing enough cells for use on humans weren't a problem. As we mentioned, IPSC's are very similar to embryonic stem cells. This has allowed researchers to create embryo-like structures that mimic the early stages of human development about two weeks after an embryo has been implanted into the uterus. These structures are organized into the three layers of different cell types that give rise to tissues and organs. They can be used to study the incredibly complex biological processes of early development like organ formation and the development of the nervous system. Hopefully, this will help us understand why things go wrong during that stage of development like heart defects that are present from birth. Until IPSC's came along, we weren't able to study things like that due to an international policy that says embryos can't be used for research more than 14 days after fertilization. And it doesn't stop there. IPSC's can also be used to study diseases in addition to take Parkinson's, for example. At a time it's diagnosed, most of the patients dopamine-releasing neurons in a critical area of the brain called the substantioneigra are already lost. Researchers have made IPSC's from the skin and blood cells of patients with Parkinson's using similar methods to those we described earlier. This has allowed them to grow an abundant supply of that kind of neuron, study why they're dying, and even test potential new drugs on those cells before moving into clinical trials. In the future, this might lead to more personalized medicine where your IPSC's are used to test what treatment works best for you. IPSC's are even on their way to tackling organ donor shortages. Cells generated from mice have been inserted into rat embryos, which were genetically edited so the rat could no longer grow a pancreas. The mouse IPSC's filled the empty niche, growing into a pancreas. In theory, we can use the same technique to grow human organs in animals like pigs. But we're not quite there yet. Human IPSC's have been successfully incorporated into pig embryos before, but in small numbers. So there are a few more kings to iron out before we can grow a full custom organ. In 2012, Shinya Yamanaka won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his discovery of IPSC's. At the time, IPSC's were promised as the future of cell therapies, but their true value was unexpected. They've changed how scientists approach many other aspects of biological research forever. Like that TV show with the Wicked Twist, IPSC's have delivered a satisfying ending no one could have predicted. I can't wait for season 2. I also can't wait for this month's SciShow Space Pin, and you shouldn't wait because it's going away at the end of the month and will never come back. The November Pin features near shoemaker, a NASA mission designed to meet up with an asteroid near Earth. And when this pin is no longer available at the end of the month, there will be another one for you, specially made for December. And what do you do with these pins you ask? Put them on your fancy new pinboard. You can find a pin and pinboard at dftba.com slash SciShow and the link in the description down below. They come separately or bundled. Thanks for taking a look.
commentercommentsentimentlikes
@@LaughterOnWaterThis is why funding pure science research for the sake of discovery is important. Funding only the things that have potential commercial use is hampering our research methodology in ways we only begin to comprehend.neutral1182
@@fendoroid3788IPSCs also play a huge role in research. For example they are used to grow organoids from stem cells obtained from the patient's skin cells. Then, the organoids can be studied and compared to control organoids to possibly spot the genetic origin of a certain disease.positive261
@@princeofexcessYamanaka factors also lead to development of reversing the age of the cell to age 0 without turning it into a pluripotent stem cell. This means we can now reverse aging the problem is safety trials as well as a delivery system. we do not know how to deliver yamanaka factors into so many different types of cells. First human trials should be finished in 2 years (restoring sight to the blind) comment if you'd like to know more!neutral214
@@CheeseWithMoldLiterally studying for a stem cell biology exam on Monday. I guess this is my sign to get back to studying.<br><br>Cool video!neutral194
@@ataraxia7439Really really hope we can grow new healthy tissue for living beings soon. The kind of he if it that could have for stroke victims and all other sorts of ailments would be unreal.positive68
@@ravvingarIt&#39;s cool that I&#39;ve been watching scishow for a decade, both in the classroom and in my adult life. The fun approach to topics is always refreshing. There&#39;s an object positivity that seems to cloud out the real world for a few brief minutes.positive58
@@NECRO1369Would be nice to see this advance more in nerves and skin regeneration. Burnt my eyelids off years ago and still waitin to get new eyelids to progress towards getting my eyesight back.negative44
@@deltacx1059Don&#39;t worry I&#39;m just going to sit here with optic nerve damage for the next few decades until someone finally decides we actually need stem cell therapy.negative27
@@rimigillGreat video! One of the things you didn’t mention is although the iPSC themselves aren’t used for many approved therapies, there are many iPSC DERIVED cell therapies in the clinic and in trials such as immune cell transplants to treat cancer. These offer huge off the shelf potential even if it’s not the iPSC themselves but the differentiated cell lineagepositive24
@@thescourgeofathousanDoes anyone else find the loss of the ability to consistently and cheaply heal ourselves entirely and the gain of the ability to improve consumer confidence in pharmaceutical product purchase recommendation at all suspicious? ?neutral20
@@zatar123This also has tie-ins to cancer researcher Given that cancer is basically just stem cells running amuck, and there is evidence that the same process that causes stem cells to specialize into a given cell type can cause cancer cells to revert back to being normal cells.neutral17
@@processingpodcastseattleThanks! We love SciShow.positive15
@@IwannagoliveinthewoodsMy lab has used iPSCs (and the cells we turn them into) from multiple sclerosis patients to try to figure out what&#39;s going wrong in the MS brain. Love seeing them be talked about more!positive15
@@Samu2010lolcatsInternational treaties: &quot;You can&#39;t use (&gt;14 days old) embryos for research.&quot;<br>Scientists: &quot;Fine, we&#39;ll use IPSC clones instead.&quot;neutral14
@@nachoijpSlowly but surely we&#39;re making progress. It&#39;s hard to focus on the good things sometimes, but we do them and it&#39;s good to see itpositive11
@@ConstantChaos1Embryonic stem cells are perfectly ethicalpositive11
@@mariaconcertina6562Yay! I feel like I haven&#39;t seen a Rose video in ages and I really like herpositive9
@@thatchessguy7072What about the research which shows using 3/4ths of the yamanaka factors (very specific ones) to reverse aging without causing cancer? ?positive8
@@spydermonkey9381Woohoo 🙌 science.positive8
@@UHFStation1I really hope we can regenerate the retina in humans like in mice. In general we need nerve repairs. So many people with chronic pain and getting addicted to pills and going on disability.negative7
@@juliekaalaas9071Awesome advancements. 🙌positive7
@@The_Savage_WombatStem cells are not as patentable as drugs. Keep that in mind when reading studies or trials involving them.neutral7
@@andreblakely4787My greatest happiness is the $28,000 weekly profit I get consistentlypositive6
@@CL-go2jiAnd also: the original attempt to generate specific cell types (retinal cells, etc) is stalled, not stoped. We may yet get there!neutral5
@@GreasyFoxStem cell therapy could pay for the way to advance regenerative medicine now, if only there is more funding for this research decades ago.neutral5
@@johntim5293Have they had any news on stem&gt;germ/sperm cells yet? I remember following a doctor in California researching and developing this 10-15 years ago. ?neutral5
@@hulduYou almost feel pity for all the animals that get in between us humans. Then again in the end we&#39;re all just animals on this planet, we humans are just exceptionally cruel.negative5
@@kae8450The main issue why ipsc is found to have more mutations is because <br>1. Cells that are reprogrammed may already contained some levels of mutations that is carried forward after it is reprogrammed.<br>2. Most reprogramming methods involved integration of extra genetic materials that knocks in the genes randomly, causes random mutations to occur.<br>It’d be a good idea to monitor and often sequence the genome to monitor these mutations from occurring. In a preventive effort, may need to use a non-integrating methods in ipsc generation. But of course currently it’s not that efficient, maybe the next person to produce a mutation-free ipsc might get a nobel prize 🤷🏻‍♂️neutral4
@@scottrichards3587Advances now have so many required safeguards that the time to take scientific discovery to consumer products is ridiculous. An old writer (maybe Shakespeare?) suggested executing all baristers. That might be a net positive for humanity. ?negative4
@@alexswingle5576Great script writing for this video! Very easy to follow and great the information! Loved this video :)positive4
@@KWiflerMy guess is that mutations in those cells are normal in the absence of an immune system. The immune system might help destroy mutant cells.neutral4
@@MrMoorfrosch&quot;This has allowed researchers to create embryo-like structures that mimic human development&quot;<br>Sweet, man made horrors beyond my understanding...negative4
@@fraliexbFirstneutral4
@@RaymenNumeralsAnyone that said first:🤡negative4
@@jakobburton-sundman8549That&#39;s how discoveries work. Not &quot;I found it.&quot; But:&quot;What the..?&quot; ?neutral3
@@MasterDayTraderGlad I&#39;m still relatively Young, to take advantage of this new future technology.positive3
@@jeffbrinkerhoff5121Patrick Riordan&#39;s clinic in Panama has been treating patients with considerable success. Also there&#39;s a clinic in Boca Raton cultivating patients&#39; stem cell.positive3
@@dr.kenworthysbiologyinfo3110I teach biology and we cover iPSCs in class. Thanks for videos like this with updated information related to stuff in textbooks.positive3
@@Ozymandius_corn_mazeI&#39;m curious if it would be easier to grow the new organ in the recipient, rather than in a pig or other animal.neutral3
@@rayhaanadam9520Love this channel 🤩positive3
@@kansascityshuffle8526After the multiple fraudulent research discoveries in the field of study I’m glad it is still around.neutral3
@@pyrogotz5076Something about a pig with human organs feels wrong... What if someone were to eat the pig? Though I think it&#39;s just the idea of a pig being opened up for human organs that seems disturbing for the most part. ?negative3
@@GeroscientistAs someone in the field, there is so much more to this story that was missed - it might even &#39;reverse aging&#39;. <br><br>Epigenetic reprogramming can be applied in live animals to partly &#39;reverse aging&#39;, which has been shown by top labs (e.g. Belmonte, Serrano, Sinclair) in multiple different organs. Altos labs recently got $3B funding from people like Bezos, likely the largest startup raise in history, just to advance this research. <br><br>This technique is specifically known as partial epigenetic reprogramming, which unlike &#39;full&#39; reprogramming, aims to rejuvenate adult cells without taking them back all the way to stem cells (which would become a tumor). Not only does this have the potential to reverse age-related diseases like glaucoma or Alzheimer&#39;s, it might also treat genetic orphan diseases like progeria.positive3
@@thejamesthirdGrow me a new lower back please 😅negative3
@@babygorilla4233Wow we just got one of the building blocks for some sifi level technology. In a couple generations we&#39;ll be doing some crazy stuff.positive2
@@tsz5868How they can stop growing??? This is the most important question. ?negative2
@@militantpacifist13Peter: WHY AREN’T WE FUNDING THIS!? ?negative2
@@MrCheckster2000Can&#39;t wait until they figure out the pancreas cause I need a new onenegative2
@@deathsoulger1The mesangial cells in the glomerulus is an aspect I didn&#39;t know about.neutral2
@@TheGoldNinja101It sounds like anything is possible, including the potential of turning a cherry from a living plant into a living and talking being, even if it means that&#39;d going to be a hybrid of a plant that produces cherries. You can say that it&#39;s impossible, however, All we need is something new to explore. Maybe that cherry would have something we don&#39;tpositive2